|
Final Report
Executive Summary
Principal Investigator:
Roland G. Tharp University of California, Santa Cruz
Principal Researchers:
Marilyn Feathers Zuni Middle School
Georgia Epaloose Zuni Public School District
Penny Bird Zuni Public School District
R. Soleste Hilberg University of California, Santa Cruz
Hector Rivera University of California, Santa Cruz
Major Research Questions
The primary questions that guided project research were:
Is higher performance of the Standards for Effective Pedagogy
associated with greater student achievement?
What are the primary obstacles to education reform in resistant
schools, and the conditions necessary for overcoming them?
Major Goals
The goals of our work, in addition to examining our research questions,
have been to:
assist the Zuni Public School District achieve
school reform to make education appropriate and effective for Zuni students
and responsive to the goals and values of the Zuni community;
document the journey of the Zuni Public School
District toward school reform, for the benefit of other Native American
communities with similar goals;
facilitate opportunities for Zuni Community Involvement;
and extend our research and development of the Standards
for Effective Pedagogy.
Assistance
Our objective in assisting district reform efforts was to tailor the
focus and forms of our assistance to the evolving needs, requests, and
conditions within the district. Therefore, our assistance, focused on
reforming classroom teaching, took many forms, such as the formalization
of a teacher professional development portfolio system of accountability;
and professional development on: (a) Effective Teaching Strategies for
Native American students, (b) student portfolios, (c) student assessment,
and (d) Activity Centers. In our final year, we completed two resources
to assist future district professional development: Culturally Compatible
Teaching for the Zuni Community, a teacher training video on effective
Teaching for Native American students; and "Activity Centers" Handbook:
A Guide for Teachers at ALL Levels and for ALL Subject Areas, a teacher
guide to effective teaching strategies and classroom organization.
Documentation
During the second year of this project, district reform efforts encountered
strong resistance from teachers and some building principals, ranging
from disinterest and noncompliance with district requests, to complaints
to the teachers' union and threatened lawsuits. Thus, an added focus of
our study became the documentation of the dynamics of schools whose personnel
resist reform initiated by their communities. Two of our project publications
document the experience and insights gained: "Seven More Mountains
and a Map: Overcoming Obstacles for Reform in Native America;" and
"In Sight of Home: School Reform in a Native American Community."
Community Involvement
Our stance, since the origin of this project, is successful education
reform requires the authentic involvement of parents and community members
to achieve reforms consistent with the values and goals of the local community.
Authentic community involvement in education can be the single most critical
factor for achieving school reform anywhere. Authentic involvement means
including community members fully, with equal voice with teachers and
administrators, in decision-making regarding curriculum, pedagogy, and
administration, and involves the building of mutual respect, self-respect,
mutual influence, and shared goals and visions. For a variety of reasons,
many of which are articulated in our paper, "Seven More Mountains and
a Map," Zuni families have no reliable way of influencing their schools.
We therefore worked with the district, community, and tribal council to
create opportunities for authentic parent and community involvement, initially
through focus groups and the inclusion of parents, community members,
parent and grandparent mentors in our inservices and institutes on Standards
for Effective Pedagogy, and then through our collaborative community survey.
Community survey. The Zuni school leadership consistently
asserted that their goals for school reform had the support of the Zuni
community. Resistant teachers and administrators contested this claim,
typically maintaining that the parents they talk to want their children
to learn standard academics, that the teachers, not the parents and elders,
know how to teach that subject matter, and furthermore, most Zunis don't
care and have little interest in schooling anyway. The Zuni community
survey was developed so that Zuni opinions, beliefs and values about education
could be examined, documented, and presented to local educators. The development
of the survey was a collaborative effort between the Zuni Public School
District, the Zuni Tribal Council, and CREDE. The survey became a means
to articulate the desires of the Zuni community regarding local education
reform efforts and their expectations for the schools. Findings from the
survey (Rivera et al., 2001) are summarized below. The survey:
- reiterated the goals and objectives of the community for the education
of Zuni children as outlined in the original charter of the Zuni Public
School District;
- provided valuable information that reassures the community that the
teaching strategies proposed in reforms are compatible with community
values, beliefs, and every day activities; and
- provided validation and support for the Zuni bilingual immersion program.
Survey findings provided a foundation for an informed course of action
to counteract school resistance to change, corroborated that school reform
efforts in curriculum, classroom instruction, and bilingual education
are compatible with the goals established by the community 20 years ago,
and verified that those goals still comprise a reliable consensus among
community members regardless of age or gender. The information from this
community survey has and will continue to serve the local government,
the community, the school district and each school by providing vital
data to forward the development of curriculum, school/community relations,
bilingual education, and teachers' professional expertise. The survey
will also contribute valuable information for other community programs.
Standards for Effective Pedagogy
One of this project's two primary research areas was the relationship
between teachers' use of the Standards for Effective Pedagogy and student
achievement. To facilitate such analyses, a quantitative classroom observation
instrument was developed, the Standards Performance Continuum (SPC), to
obtain objective data on teachers' use of the standards. The SPC demonstrated
good to excellent reliability, with a Spearman's Rank-Order coefficient
of .96. The development and validity study on the SPC will be published
as a chapter in a CREDE book on classroom observation measures (Hilberg,
Doherty, Epaloose & Tharp, in press).
In the second year of this project, our researchers collaborated with
a middle school teacher in a quasi-experimental classroom study to determine
the effects of the CREDE instructional model in eighth grade mathematics
classes. That study demonstrated that students taught with the CREDE instructional
model, incorporating the Standards for Effective Pedagogy: (a) learned
more mathematics, (b) retained more of what they learned, and (c) demonstrated
greater improvement in attitudes towards mathematics than students in
control classes receiving more traditional instruction. A paper on this
study appeared in Equity and Excellence in Education (Hilberg,
Tharp & DeGeest, 2000).
In project year four, systematic SPC data were obtained through both
live and videotaped observations to examine in relationship to student
achievement. Data on teaching performance consisted of three to five live
observations per teacher, and four to nine videotaped observations per
teacher. This analysis used students' normal curve equivalent (NCE) scores
on end-of-year standardized tests (CTBS) in five subject areas: mathematics,
science, social studies, language arts and reading. Because students'
language arts and reading performance were attributed to the same teacher,
these two scores were collapsed into a single score (language arts/reading).
Results obtained in these analyses provide modest support for the value
of teachers' use of CREDE's standards: SPC scores were positively associated
with achievement gains in language arts/reading and science. Though a
teacher or school can account for only 10 to 20% of variation in student
achievement (Soar, 1980), inspection of the beta weights of SPC scores
revealed a potentially powerful effect on student learning. An increase
of 2.94 NCE points in science scores could be predicted from an increase
in science teachers' SPC scores of .82 (one standard deviation); for language
arts and reading, an increase in students' language arts/reading scores
of .92 NCE points could be predicted by an increase in teachers' SPC scores
of 1.17. Thus, very small changes in teacher performance as defined by
the SPC could have profound effects on student achievement. Though the
findings from this study was constrained by a narrow, low-to-moderate
range of teacher SPC scores, we are optimistic about the gains students
might make when skilled, knowledgeable teachers make effective use of
the standards.
|
|